Cited Charts

The Unemployment Rate Is Not What You Think

Episode 05 · 11:05 · watch

The 14.9 million figure is a counterfactual, not a count. It is today's population multiplied by the participation rate of January 2000, minus today's labour force. A large share of the fall is that the country is older than it was in 2000, and people over 65 participate at a far lower rate. Retirement is not unemployment, and this data cannot separate the causes.

The figures used

Current Population Survey, October 2026 unless statedValue
U-3 unemployment rate, October 20264.1 %
U-6 unemployment rate, October 20267.9 %
Gap today3.8 points
U-6 as a multiple of U-31.93×
Median gap, 393 months4.0 points
Narrowest gap in the series2.9 points
Widest gap in the series8.1 points
Labour force participation rate, today61.9 %
…peak67.3 % in January 2000
Difference5.4 points
Employment-population ratio, today59.3 %
…peak64.7 % in April 2000
Civilian adult population275.7 m
Labour force170.7 m
Employed163.6 m
Unemployed7.1 m
Labour force at the participation rate of 2000185.5 m
Difference14.9 m

A check worth repeating. The population series is published unadjusted while the rate series are seasonally adjusted. Labour force divided by population gives 61.91 % against a published 61.9 % — which is how BLS forms the rate, so the two sets are compatible. The build script stops if that check fails.

Sources

Data files

As used in the episode — the charts are generated from exactly this.

bls-u3-u6-1994-2026.json 393 months, five series bls-levels-2026.json population, labour force, employed, unemployed

What these numbers do not say

Corrections

None yet. Errors reported in the comments are corrected here and noted with the date.

← All episodes